Promising Practices for Environmental Justice Methodologies in NEPA Reviews
The Promising Practices report was developed by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Committee and the Federal Interagency Working Group on Environmental Justice as a compilation of best practices that federal agencies can consider for conducting environmental justice analyses for NEPA reviews. These promising practices offer a variety of methodological approaches that may be suitable across various NEPA activities. The report provides recommendations, but is not formal agency guidance, and does not establish new requirements for NEPA analysis.
Resource Details
Related resources (by topic)
Center for Law and Social Policy (CLASP)
A public interest law and policy organization which promotes policies to improve the economic security of low-income families and to secure access to our civil justice system for all low-income persons.
Center for Neighborhood Technology
Our goal is to advance urban sustainability and shared prosperity through initiatives in transportation, water, climate, and public policy. We coach city leaders, advise decision-makers, and find new ways to solve challenges.
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP)
Conducts research and analysis on proposed budget and tax policies, with an emphasis on those affecting low- and moderate-income people.
Center on Wisconsin Strategy (COWS)
A national policy center and field laboratory for high-road capitalism — a competitive market economy of shared prosperity, environmental sustainability, and capable democratic government.
Help us expand the Resource Hub
Share resources that you think would be a good addition to this tool and our team will review them for inclusion in future updates.