Knowing like a global expert organization: Comparative insights from the IPCC and IPBES
Highlights
• Knowledge practices in different organisations need to be analysed more explicitly.
• We compare how IPBES and the IPCC produce, combine, and negotiate knowledge.
• Significant differences in their knowledge practices exist between these two GEAs.
• These differences can be captured using the concept of institutional epistemology.
• Awareness of institutional epistemology can support reflexive governance.
Resource Details
Related resources (by topic)
Center for Law and Social Policy (CLASP)
A public interest law and policy organization which promotes policies to improve the economic security of low-income families and to secure access to our civil justice system for all low-income persons.
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP)
Conducts research and analysis on proposed budget and tax policies, with an emphasis on those affecting low- and moderate-income people.
Center on Wisconsin Strategy (COWS)
A national policy center and field laboratory for high-road capitalism — a competitive market economy of shared prosperity, environmental sustainability, and capable democratic government.
Centering equity and justice in climate philanthropy
Foreword In 2019, Ariadne, a network of European foundations supporting social change and human rights issues, organised a grant skills workshop for our members focused on funding with a climate justice lens. At the time, many of our members were…
Help us expand the Resource Hub
Share resources that you think would be a good addition to this tool and our team will review them for inclusion in future updates.